# blog.jaye.ch $ cat the-new-jerusalem.md▊

The New Jerusalem

the vacuum: after an ideology fell, a country without a frame — and the group that supplied one, and claimed the nation as the world’s sacred centre.

The full post

← home · three environments, one mechanism, with notes
Contents 8 sections
  1. 1. What the environment supplies when it has nothing to supply
  2. 2. The raw material that was still there
  3. 3. The group that filled it
  4. 4. The practice: what is documented, and what is inferred
  5. 5. The endpoint, and what the state asked for
  6. 6. The counterweights, and one collision worth avoiding
  7. 7. What this case adds
  8. Notes

After an ideology fell, a country without a frame — and the group that supplied one, and claimed the nation as the world’s sacred centre

Seventh of the case studies. The method post set the rule; the empty vessel took the mechanism outside Brazil into a culture that already had the safeguard. This one takes it to the opposite condition — a country that had just lost its frame entirely. Three environments, one mechanism.

Status. The events are documented and adjudicated; the reading of them through this series’ model is an inference, offered as one. The post relies on two recent academic studies of the movement (a 2026 Kyiv study of its doctrine and ritual; a 2026 Calgary thesis on its rituals) and on the trial record. It names the founders because a court convicted them. As everywhere in this series: a description of an environment is not a finding about anyone’s mind.

1. What the environment supplies when it has nothing to supply

The Brazilian cases argued that an environment can pre-supply the levers a predator otherwise has to build. Japan supplied a safeguard a group had to overthrow. Both are environments with content.

This case is the third condition, and it is the one that makes the argument general:

An environment can also supply nothing — and a vacuum of meaning is itself a lever.

In 1991 the Soviet Union ended. Across its former republics, the frame that had organised public life for seventy years stopped, and nothing replaced it. A Ukrainian academic account of the movement that appeared in that gap describes the condition plainly: the group emerged as “an expression of spiritual crisis and the transformation of religiosity in post-Soviet Ukraine,” a “search for new forms of sacrality after the collapse of totalitarian ideology,” while “exposing the dangers of religious manipulation during times of social transformation.”1

Read that as a specification of the environment, and every clause is a lever:

what the collapse left what it does for a group
no organising frame the group’s frame faces no competitor
a population trained to believe collectively belief itself is intact — only its object is missing
a nation in an identity crisis a cosmic role for the nation is available to be granted
no reliable authorities the authority slot is empty and unguarded

Brazil’s environment did the predator’s framing for it. Ukraine’s did something subtler: it left the demand — the hunger for a frame — and let one group supply the whole thing. It is the coercion post’s selection criterion — no holder present — raised from a person to a country.

2. The raw material that was still there

A vacuum is not an absence of culture, and this is where the case gets specific. What remained in Ukraine was not nothing; it was material, and some of it was unusually well suited to what came next:

  • An eschatological inheritance. A society formed by Orthodox Christianity does not need eschatology explained. The vocabulary of apocalypse, resurrection, the Mother of God, and a chosen people was culturally resident — and could be re-pointed without translation.
  • A national sacred geography. The movement’s central claim was not merely doctrinal. Per the Kyiv study, its teaching “proclaimed Ukraine as the sacred centre of world renewal and Kyiv as the ‘New Jerusalem’,” with a female messiah — the “Mother of the World” — embodying the dawn of an “Age of Light.”1 That is the messianic slot of the method post — the awaited figure who arrives with authority no one granted him — given a national address. The group did not ask for a following; it offered a country a role in the cosmos.
  • A traumatised population. The decade’s injuries — the collapse, the economic shock, and in Ukraine the still-live memory of Chernobyl — supplied a great deal of suffering looking for a meaning.

So the environment’s contribution was not a lever set. It was a market: a hungry population, a resident vocabulary, and an empty chair. And the case studies have already shown what an empty chair is worth.

3. The group that filled it

The movement called itself the Great White Brotherhood YUSMALOS — the acronym compounding its three divine components: YUS for its founder, MA for its prophet, LOS for the planetary Logos.

Yuri Krivonogov — Yuoan Swami — was a cybernetics engineer and, in the phrase the record uses, a “specialist in psychological influence.” He had been in the International Society for Krishna Consciousness and was expelled for claiming to be Krishna’s avatar; in 1988 he founded an “Institute of Man” and lectured on meditation and spiritual practices.2

Marina Tsvigun — Maria Devi Christos — was a former Komsomol journalist, who claimed a near-death experience and was proclaimed by the movement as the “Living God”, the female messiah and Mother of the World.2 The group promised a Golden Age to exactly 144,000 elect — the “Yusmalians”— and taught that the others would be destroyed by fohata, a divine energy and its “fohatic radiation.”3

Two things about that pair are worth pausing on. The one who could read and shape states supplied the technique; the one who was proclaimed divine supplied the endpoint. That division of labour is the coercion post’s structure exactly — and note that neither was the source of the demand. The demand was already there.

4. The practice: what is documented, and what is inferred

This is where the case meets the mechanism post — and where it stops short of it, and the stopping point should be said plainly rather than papered over. The practice and the frame are documented. The interior state is not. There is no account here of the dissociative phenomenology the Aum case supplies in its founder’s own words; what follows is a practice, a graded path and an appraisal, and the step from those to the collapse is an inference — stated as one, and not leaned on harder than it will bear.

What is documented is the practice, and it is not a generic coercion inventory. The Kyiv study finds that the movement combined Christian eschatology, esoteric cosmology, occult feminism and “psychotechnical practices” — a study of the movement’s rituals, themselves “underexamined in Western scholarship,” reads them as bound up with conversion4 — and that its conclusions concern a wider shift: “from religion of belief to religion of experience, where ritual serves as a tool of inner transformation.”1

That is the mechanism’s own description of itself — the shift from believing to undergoing, with the ritual built to produce the undergoing. On that, the coercion post’s inventory follows as the record gives it:

  • A graded path of self-transformation — meditation taught as the route in; the state itself as the goal.
  • Ascetic pressure on the second axis — fasting and hunger strikes appear throughout the record (detained members went on hunger strike; the movement’s practice was marked by fasting) — lowering damping, moving the system toward the cliff.5
  • Milieu control — the renunciation of family ties, the donation of property and money to the Brotherhood, the wearing of white; recruitment of the young, including minors.2
  • A structure built to hold it — a “strict hierarchy and discipline,” operating, per the investigator, in cells of five relaying information up to the founders.2

And the appraisal — the move that makes the state un-rescuable — was supplied by the doctrine itself: the collapse is the Age of Light; those outside are not merely wrong but about to be destroyed by radiation only the elect will survive. Every warning sign arrives already re-coded as election.

5. The endpoint, and what the state asked for

A frame that owns the ending sets the date. The movement’s apocalypse was announced for 24 November 1993 and revised repeatedly as it approached (Palmer’s record of the leaflets has “countdown” dates of 24, then 14, then 11 November);5 the gathering was fixed for 10 November 1993, when its members attempted to take Saint Sophia’s Cathedral in Kyiv — with, by the record, a plan to kill Tsvigun and then self-immolate inside it, in the belief that she would rise on the third day to judge the world.2

This is the mechanism post’s trap made liturgical: the state that most needs care is the state that feels like the destination. The members were not walking toward a danger; they were walking toward a resurrection. Police intervened; some six hundred members were detained; twenty-five were charged; the detained went on hunger strike, and stood down only on Tsvigun’s word.2

The adjudication came in 1996: Tsvigun four years, Krivonogov seven, a third leader six, for seizing public buildings and endangering citizens “under the guise of religious rites.”2

Note what closed the case, because the series keeps returning to it: not a better idea, and not the frame’s own self-correction — a raid and a law. The state that had vacated the frame supplied the check the frame could not.

6. The counterweights, and one collision worth avoiding

Three, and the first prevents a real error.

A different group has almost the same name. The Bulgarian White Brotherhood — the Bălgaro Bialo Bratstvo of Peter Deunov, a Rosicrucian-influenced order founded in 1900 and still practising its paneurhythmy in the Rila mountains — is not this movement. It shares the name and nothing else. Any account that merges them is simply wrong, and the resemblance is a trap the series’ own rule about resolving names before using them is designed to catch.6

This was also a panic, and the panic did harm of its own. The case became one of the post-Soviet world’s defining “sect” scares; a substantial scholarly literature reads it through stigma and the media’s role, and the movement’s name became a byword for a hazard.5 That is the label post’s territory: the group did documented harm and was also made an object, and the two facts do not cancel. It is worth saying plainly that a case study is not a licence to generalise from it to every unfamiliar group that follows.

And an honest limit on the mechanism claim. The practices here — meditation, fasting, ecstatic ritual, the “religion of experience” — are documented, and they are the same territory as the mechanism. But the specific dissociative phenomenology that the Aum case supplies in the founders’ own words (the guru’s clone, the staged kundalini) is not documented this precisely for the White Brotherhood. What is documented is the practice and the frame; the interior states of the members are inferred, not measured. The post’s claim should be held at that strength.

7. What this case adds

The series’ taxonomy — Brazil given, Japan guarded, Ukraine absent, India-to-the-West built — and the finding that the environment sets the price rather than the choice, are stated in full in the series opener. This case’s own contribution is the third square: an environment that supplies nothing, and the discovery that a vacuum is a lever, because a population that has just lost its frame is the most willing buyer of a new one.

Notes

Marking: documented — the movement’s existence, founders, doctrine, practices, the 10 November 1993 event and the 1996 convictions; the academic characterisations quoted (Valiukh; Boots; Palmer). The distinction from the Bulgarian White Brotherhood. Argument — that the post-Soviet vacuum functions as a lever; that the three case studies share one mechanism and differ only in what the environment supplies and what it costs the group; that the interior states here are inferred rather than measured. The inference and the limit are both stated in the body.

  1. Valiukh, D. (2026). “The Doctrinal and Ritual Features of the ‘White Brotherhood’,” Sophia (Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv), doi:10.17721/sophia.2026.27.1 — the movement as an expression of “spiritual crisis” in post-Soviet Ukraine; the “search for new forms of sacrality after the collapse of totalitarian ideology”; the “dangers of religious manipulation during times of social transformation”; the synthesis of Christian eschatology, esoteric cosmology, occult feminism and “psychotechnical practices”; the “Mother of the World” as female Messiah and the “Age of Light”; Ukraine as the sacred centre of world renewal and Kyiv as the “New Jerusalem”; and the wider claim of a shift “from religion of belief to religion of experience, where ritual serves as a tool of inner transformation.” https://sophia.knu.ua/index.php/sophia/article/view/276↩︎

  2. On the movement, its founders, doctrine and adjudication — the YUSMALOS acronym; Krivonogov as a cybernetics engineer and “specialist in psychological influence,” his ISKCON expulsion, the “Institute of Man” and his lectures on meditation; Tsvigun as “Living God” and Mother of the World; the 144,000; renunciation of family ties, donation of property, white clothing, recruitment of the young including minors; strict hierarchy; the 10 November 1993 seizure of Saint Sophia’s Cathedral and the plan to kill Tsvigun and self-immolate in the belief she would rise on the third day; the detention of some six hundred members, the hunger strike, and the 1996 sentences (Tsvigun four years, Krivonogov seven, Kovalchuk six). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Brotherhood_(religious_group) · https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marina_Tsvigun · On the internal structure — the investigator Viktor Shokin’s account of cells of five relaying information up to the founders — and on the 144,000 elect and the Golden Age, see the long-form journalistic record (the RT long-read “From Communist to Mother of the World,” republished at culteducation.com), which reports Shokin directly; treat as reported testimony, not adjudicated fact. https://culteducation.com/group/1289-general-information/38894-from-communist-to-mother-of-the-world-inside-the-white-brotherhood-cult.html The 144,000 also appears in Palmer (see below), quoting contemporary press.↩︎

  3. On fohata as the movement’s divine energy and the “fohatic radiation” said to destroy non-believers — the doctrine as reported in the journalistic record (the RT long-read “From Communist to Mother of the World,” republished at culteducation.com); treated here as reported doctrine. The term derives from Theosophical literature (Blavatsky’s fohat).↩︎

  4. Boots, N. (2026). Conflicts of Meaning: Ritual, Conversion, and Cult Formation in the Great White Brotherhood (Master’s thesis, University of Calgary) — the movement’s ritual practices “remain underexamined in Western scholarship”; the thesis analyses those rituals and their relation to conversion. https://ucalgary.scholaris.ca/items/2cf13a37-9321-46fb-a2d9-126f866f9835↩︎

  5. Palmer, S. J. — on the White Brotherhood, the media and stigma, and the movement’s fasting; the case is treated in the scholarly literature on “sects, suicide and stigma.” https://books.openedition.org/uop/1120?lang=en — and see Predko, O., & Predko, D. (2021), “Religious Epidemics on the Territory of Ukraine,” Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe 41(1), Article 7. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol41/iss1/7/↩︎

  6. The Bulgarian White Brotherhood (Bălgaro Bialo Bratstvo) — a distinct movement founded in 1900 by Peter Deunov (Beinsa Douno), Rosicrucian-influenced and still extant as the Universal White Brotherhood — is unrelated to the Ukrainian Great White Brotherhood YUSMALOS beyond the shared name. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_White_Brotherhood↩︎